The Plague of Misidentification

Conception, Creation, Critical Distinctions, Terms & the Structural Fundamentals of the Series

Conception 

Over the coming series of essays, all with the singular goal of observing and describing reality, I will be creating and exegeting the architecture in the hope of bringing clarity. It will be a creation because what will be written is more than just the uncovering of the architecture of this reality in whatever sense I address it per each individual composition. By nature, there will be required thinking systems, tools, and the like that will need to be applied well to the topic. In these areas of application, there will by necessity be creation on my part, or rather, to speak of things precisely as they are; it will be a re-creating. A hint, in short, nothing dealing with humans psychologically is without its precedent, and that fact, a fact of the causal stream or matrix, makes things both simple in one sense and complex in another. The important thing, for now, is to try not to divide or resolve the two senses (the simple and the complex), and a more profound understanding will be brought to you by that one critical action. 

Critical Distinctions

It is within this state of superimposed levels of simplicity and complexity that I will be creating and that my creating will be nothing more than re-creation. As I play with this a little and at the reader's expense, also a little, I do so to push forward jovially the need for critical distinctions. Along with the understanding that critical distinctions are essential if we are ever to properly discern reality because it is through making them appropriately that we can stop misidentification and thus better understand what it is that we hold within our observation, it is also crucial that we need not take people to task on such things unless they are dealing with the types of material that make these distinctions essential. This series of essays attempts to take apart and explain reality and its causal mechanisms; thus, this is the exact type of material to afford us this rigorous focus on articulating such distinctions.

Types of Creation

The concept of factual creation, in contrast to re-creation (which is what most people mean when they say creation), is of critical importance. We will go into both of them deeply in time, bringing out their essences so that when needed, we will use these descriptors in accordance with the reality that exists. For now, let's set the dividing line. Factual creation is pure creation, or authentic creation, which is the form of creating that happens first and without precedent in this space-time or from another extant state that may or may not be knowable through human perceptive capacities, e.g., the creating of a universe where there was none before by a subsistent being that was itself not created, constructed, or generated. Re-creating is the form of creating that a creation would or could perform, meaning that which was generated by whatever means would then create by and through its essence, whether by desire or any other means, e.g., a child generating a crayon drawing from their imagination. Note, this could just as well have been a tree growing a leaf. This type of creation does not regard sentience, consciousness, intelligence, beings with the capacity for differentiation, emotions, or any like concepts or attributes. 

Exegesis

This writing will be exegetical from the standpoint that I will bring out in detail the constituents of the factual architecture clearly and succinctly by re-creative means. This, by nature, of the bringing out is exegetical. As a result, the architecture will stand in plain sight on its own once revealed and with proper logic supporting the descriptors such that what is visible conceptually will be what is factual.   

Regarding This Series, Its Structure and Method of Delivery

Each essay in this series will be able to stand alone concerning its topic on an introductory level. Next, essays will act as components that, when aggregated over time, will yield great breadth and depth. The first hundred or so of the essays will lay out the initial concepts and terms with brief yet sound definitions, examples, and philosophical explanations of their context, meanings, and functions. As this series builds on itself, you will start to see more clearly four levels of understanding that will be brought into view of your mind's eye a little at a time, building in parallel to each other. This may seem slightly unorthodox at first, but you will soon realize that not only is it a great way to gain understanding, but for us humans, it is highly probably the only way we could approach gaining an understanding of something this vast. I will introduce concepts in parallel, often with a short statement giving essential details or an "I will be writing about this in an upcoming essay" comment. This will aid in cementing the concepts as well as hopefully keeping boredom at bay as you will always have multiple things to ponder, if not from most paragraphs, at the least from each essay. 

Substack

I am still learning the formatting on Substack and what works best overall. My current plan is to aim for a range between five hundred and one thousand words per essay with a max of two thousand. 

The Levels

Now let's take a look at those levels since they are essential to helping you move forward. The levels are as follows:

1. Develop the ability to identify and understand the many types of inhibitors that keep us from seeing the architecture. 

2. Learning and understanding the thinking tools and systems that help us confidently discern what we are observing. 

3. Develop the ability to identify the constituents of the architecture.

4. Developing process and how to move forward in gaining a deeper understanding of the scaffolding and, thereby, the architecture as a whole. This uses levels 1, 2, and 3 while adding a nesting of those levels within the forming process. It continually builds upon itself within your thinking and understanding such that all levels are enhanced reciprocally.

A Caution

This, of course, only works if you apply yourself to the material. As the complexity increases, you will have to work continually to gain the ability to fully comprehend the additions and how they outcrop. After the first twenty essays, it will be absolutely essential that you are firmly founded in all concepts brought forward up to that point in time. Otherwise, it is highly likely that things will start to look undoable, untrackable, illogical, or insane, or you could simply lose interest due to the belief that you cannot do it. 

Encouragement

I urge each of you to continue in your studies. With dedicated continual effort over time, it will all start to become crystal clear, and you will grasp these concepts as effortlessly as your inner language. Yes, it will take maximum effort to gain that level, but it will be well worth it for you and those around you.

We will continue. 

B.S.R.