Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Perry Lines's avatar

I definitely share Patrick's sentiment that the vast number of angles and potential questions to approach business decisions from is difficult to process, and I am thinking about what you said regarding a functional understanding of each of those aspects and how that can act as a helpful filter. I'm reminder of what you said in an earlier post: that you do not have to know everything to know something. And, would this functional understanding be similar to what you wrote about having the true definition of a thing versus knowing its function? From that angle, knowing each field in depth would be necessary, but taking the time to deeply study each would result in the bottlenecking you mentioned here. So I am wondering if it's more of a balance, and in terms of decision making, and in the immediate context regarding business, approaching from the standpoint of, what are the needs of my business? What are the connecting points within each of these fields that would support or go against these needs? And investigating from that standpoint.

And to your last encouragement, reading those paragraphs strikes me deeply every time. In light of definitions and filters, I think the chain of harm you lay out depicts the insane amount of damage that is done when starting from the assertion of unassailability/arrogance. "Victory" is already being filtered improperly in that the goal is to defeat the free will of others and defeat any dissent, whereas in reality, the true enemy is the evil within me. It's to defeat my own ego and my own deficiencies in thought and in love, and the lie of my own victimhood. This is particularly striking to me here: "Do not give up unless you are giving up that which you use to bind you." It seems so backwards, that I am the one binding myself by my thinking. If I am presented with truth and attack it with hostility, that is no fault but my own. Truth exposes the reality that I don't want to change or grow, because what I am doing "works" for me. But I think true liberty in the way you describe it, is knowing yourself clearly, and your own capacity for destruction, and choosing meekness, resisting the temptation to dominate through knowledge and instead create something with it and serve.

Expand full comment
Patrick Atwater's avatar

I have never heard of PEST or its variants but it is fascinating all that is interconnected with regard to business. This sheds light on why so many businesses fail. To develop an understand in these areas and to stay updated on their trends seems daunting at first. But as you said, using the thinking tools and working toward a functional understanding is the way. The worst place is to stay in a state of thinking it will be too hard. Seeing how we have been recently been learning about causality and mapping events, the answers to the questions asked in the PEST model would help a business owner learn the causal maps with the highest likelihood surrounding their business which would be a huge advantage to building a successful business.

Secondly, thank you for the encouragement here! This stuff is challenging but super stimulating and I am excited to keep going. I have never considered the humbling effect of true victory, which is perhaps telling, and I definitely want to dig more into this idea.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts